🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue worked, and revealed new appeals had come from mediators to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if negotiations restart.

Trump last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the conference, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of international law, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to enforce their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the ultimate solution to address disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the identical language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the country in the wake of this assault."